# Curious: How does Prolog "Byte code" compare to .NET IL (and some thoughts about enterprise ready systems)

**URL:** <https://swi-prolog.discourse.group/t/curious-how-does-prolog-byte-code-compare-to-net-il-and-some-thoughts-about-enterprise-ready-systems/1101>\
**Category:** Help!\
**Created:** [August 21, 2019, 3:27pm UTC](https://swi-prolog.discourse.group/t/curious-how-does-prolog-byte-code-compare-to-net-il-and-some-thoughts-about-enterprise-ready-systems/1101 "2019-08-21T15:27:02Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 26

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![hnbeck](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/swi-prolog.discourse.group/hnbeck/32/3149_2.png) [@hnbeck](https://swi-prolog.discourse.group/u/hnbeck)\
**Post date:** [March 10, 2021, 6:00pm UTC](https://swi-prolog.discourse.group/t/curious-how-does-prolog-byte-code-compare-to-net-il-and-some-thoughts-about-enterprise-ready-systems/1101/26 "2021-03-10T18:00:34Z")

</div>

Thanks for the pointer. This lib was unknown to me. But the point is, it is an connector, meaning that SWI Prolog would run unmanaged as normal, right?

---

_[View the full topic](https://swi-prolog.discourse.group/t/curious-how-does-prolog-byte-code-compare-to-net-il-and-some-thoughts-about-enterprise-ready-systems/1101)._
