# Suggestion: concurrent\_findall

**URL:** <https://swi-prolog.discourse.group/t/suggestion-concurrent-findall/2628>\
**Category:** Request For Comments\
**Created:** [July 12, 2020, 6:45pm UTC](https://swi-prolog.discourse.group/t/suggestion-concurrent-findall/2628 "2020-07-12T18:45:29Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 11

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![EricGT](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/f1d935/32.png) [@EricGT](https://swi-prolog.discourse.group/u/EricGT)\
**Post date:** [July 13, 2020, 9:28am UTC](https://swi-prolog.discourse.group/t/suggestion-concurrent-findall/2628/11 "2020-07-13T09:28:25Z")

</div>

Perhaps what you seek is a cousin to [library(solution\_sequences)](https://www.swi-prolog.org/pldoc/man?section=solutionsequences) but instead of working with findall/3 , create a new predicate concurrent\_findall/3 (which might be concurrent\_and/2 or concurrent\_maplist/2 ([ref](https://stackoverflow.com/q/49036185/1243762))) and then the cousin library ( library(concurrent\_solution\_sequences) ) would work with concurrent\_findall/3.

---

_[View the full topic](https://swi-prolog.discourse.group/t/suggestion-concurrent-findall/2628)._