# Trying to document the tooling

**URL:** <https://swi-prolog.discourse.group/t/trying-to-document-the-tooling/9319>\
**Category:** Looking for Group\
**Created:** [September 25, 2025, 12:06pm UTC](https://swi-prolog.discourse.group/t/trying-to-document-the-tooling/9319 "2025-09-25T12:06:44Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jan](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/swi-prolog.discourse.group/jan/32/4_2.png) [@jan](https://swi-prolog.discourse.group/u/jan)\
**Post date:** [September 25, 2025, 12:06pm UTC](https://swi-prolog.discourse.group/t/trying-to-document-the-tooling/9319/1 "2025-09-25T12:06:44Z")

</div>

I have changed the xpce submodule wiki to turn the home page into an overview of the development tools. See [Home · SWI-Prolog/packages-xpce Wiki · GitHub](https://github.com/SWI-Prolog/packages-xpce/wiki). The console link to this page has been renamed to _Help/SWI-Prolog GUI Tools_.

I don’t know yet whether this is the best place and format for this. Alternatively we could move the Markdown to [www.swi-prolog.org](http://www.swi-prolog.org), which would provide automatic linking of predicate references. That seems minor though. The questions now are

- Does this seem useful?
- Anyone interested in turning this tool wiki into something really good in supporting users to find the right tools and use them? I you want to describe just one tool, great.