# Wiki Discussion: ChatGPT prompt topics **URL:** \ **Category:** Wiki Discussion\ **Created:** [February 17, 2023, 8:42am UTC](https://swi-prolog.discourse.group/t/wiki-discussion-chatgpt-prompt-topics/6262 "2023-02-17T08:42:33Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 3\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![EricGT](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/f1d935/32.png) [@EricGT](https://swi-prolog.discourse.group/u/EricGT)\ **Post date:** [February 17, 2023, 8:42am UTC](https://swi-prolog.discourse.group/t/wiki-discussion-chatgpt-prompt-topics/6262/1 "2023-02-17T08:42:33Z")
This is a topic to discuss the Wiki topics for ChatGPT prompts. Any replies to those topics will be automatically flagged by Discourse for admin review then manually moved here by an admin. Sometimes admins will approve the reply with out moving and then it will be manually moved later. * * * Wiki topics for ChatGPT Prompt LLM (Large Language Model) such as ChatGPT prompts related to Prolog [Link](https://swi-prolog.discourse.group/t/llm-large-language-model-such-as-chatgpt-prompts-related-to-prolog/6248) Helpful hints about using ChatGPT [Link](https://swi-prolog.discourse.group/t/helpful-hints-about-using-chatgpt/6249) ChatGPT Strengths, Weaknesses and Limitations [Link](https://swi-prolog.discourse.group/t/chatgpt-strengths-weaknesses-and-limitations/6250) ChatGPT Prompt Engineering [Link](https://swi-prolog.discourse.group/t/chatgpt-prompt-engineering/6251) Prolog FAQ (created with ChatGPT) [Link](https://swi-prolog.discourse.group/t/prolog-faq-created-with-chatgpt/6252) ChatGPT prompts - Programming - Non-coding[Link](https://swi-prolog.discourse.group/t/chatgpt-prompts-programming-non-coding/6253) ChatGPT prompts - Programming - Coding - Source Code [Link](https://swi-prolog.discourse.group/t/chatgpt-prompts-programming-coding-source-code/6254) ChatGPT prompts - Programming - Data manipulation tasks[Link](https://swi-prolog.discourse.group/t/chatgpt-prompts-programming-data-manipulation-tasks/6255) ChatGPT - answers to questions from elsewhere for comparison[Link](https://swi-prolog.discourse.group/t/chatgpt-answers-to-questions-from-elsewhere-for-comparison/6256) ChatGPT prompts - Prolog - Basics[Link](https://swi-prolog.discourse.group/t/chatgpt-prompts-prolog-basics/6257) ChatGPT prompts - Prolog - any implementation[Link](https://swi-prolog.discourse.group/t/chatgpt-prompts-prolog-any-implementation/6258) ChatGPT prompts - SWI-Prolog 1. [Link](https://swi-prolog.discourse.group/t/chatgpt-prompts-swi-prolog/6259) 2. [Link](https://swi-prolog.discourse.group/t/chatgpt-prompts-swi-prolog-2/6260) ChatGPT prompts - s(CASP) [Link](https://swi-prolog.discourse.group/t/chatgpt-prompts-s-casp/6261) ---
**Author:** ![RdR](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/swi-prolog.discourse.group/rdr/32/379_2.png) [@RdR](https://swi-prolog.discourse.group/u/RdR)\ **Post date:** [February 23, 2023, 8:01am UTC](https://swi-prolog.discourse.group/t/wiki-discussion-chatgpt-prompt-topics/6262/2 "2023-02-23T08:01:24Z")
Note: The below was posted as a reply to [LLM (Large Language Model) such as ChatGPT prompts related to Prolog](https://swi-prolog.discourse.group/t/llm-large-language-model-such-as-chatgpt-prompts-related-to-prolog/6248) but the Wiki topics do not allow for replies. It was moved here so that it can be discussed. * * * It might be useful to update the entry for GPT to add that “ChatGPT is an application built on the GPT platform (they are not the same thing). The GPT platform, including a playground similar to ChatGPT, can be accessed on [OpenAI API](https://platform.openai.com/overview) . This playground provides more controls than ChatGPT. Even more control is given through the GPT API, for which there is now a Prolog library ([prolog2gpt](https://github.com/RdR1024/prolog2gpt)) .” ---
**Author:** ![EricGT](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/f1d935/32.png) [@EricGT](https://swi-prolog.discourse.group/u/EricGT)\ **Post date:** [February 23, 2023, 9:02am UTC](https://swi-prolog.discourse.group/t/wiki-discussion-chatgpt-prompt-topics/6262/3 "2023-02-23T09:02:46Z")
> [@RdR](#): > > the entry for GPT Is this the entry you are referring to? > GPT - stands for Generative Pre-trained Transformer, which is the type of neural network architecture. GPT models have been pre-trained on large amounts of text data, which allows them to generate coherent and contextually-appropriate responses to a wide range of prompts. * * * It would be good to interject [prolog2gpt](https://github.com/RdR1024/prolog2gpt) into the knowledge on that page and add some more details to other entries. For me much of what is in your paragraph would become - an addition to the ChatGPT entry - several new glossary entries. * * * For this statement: > ChatGPT is an application built on the GPT platform. Would it be better as part of this entry > ChatGPT - A large language model developed by OpenAI that is capable of generating human-like text in response to prompts. * * * For > they are not the same thing can you expand on that. To me it is obvious that they are not the same but that statement leaves one wondering why. I agree that explaining that in more detail would help those new to the concepts. Much of the pedigree can be found in [Timeline to ChatGPT](https://lifearchitect.ai/chatgpt/#timeline). Such an entry would not have to be a verbal description, it could be a timeline, a diagram, or something else that conveys a pedigree or evolution. * * * > [@RdR](#): > > The GPT platform, including a playground similar to ChatGPT, can be accessed on [OpenAI API](https://platform.openai.com/overview). Should the name of the link be `OpenAI` and not `OpentAI API`? That would make for a nice entry for OpenAI itself in the glossary, it just needs to be rephrased to be a glossary entry. * * * > [@RdR](#): > > This playground provides more controls than ChatGPT This would also make for a nice entry and just needs some rephrasing. Would `https://platform.openai.com/playground` be the desired link for playground? * * * > [@RdR](#): > > Even more control is given through the GPT API That would make for a nice entry if rephrased into a glossary entry; would the entry name `OpenAI API` be better? And include a link to the [API documentation](https://platform.openai.com/docs/api-reference/introduction). * * * > [@RdR](#): > > there is now a Prolog library ([prolog2gpt](https://github.com/RdR1024/prolog2gpt)) That would make for a nice separate entry if rephrased as a glossary entry.