# Wiki Discussion: SWI-Prolog in the browser using WASM **URL:** \ **Category:** Wiki Discussion\ **Created:** [August 3, 2022, 8:21pm UTC](https://swi-prolog.discourse.group/t/wiki-discussion-swi-prolog-in-the-browser-using-wasm/5651 "2022-08-03T20:21:56Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 69
**Author:** ![rla](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/swi-prolog.discourse.group/rla/32/6863_2.png) [@rla](https://swi-prolog.discourse.group/u/rla)\ **Post date:** [August 9, 2022, 4:20pm UTC](https://swi-prolog.discourse.group/t/wiki-discussion-swi-prolog-in-the-browser-using-wasm/5651/69 "2022-08-09T16:20:46Z")
> [@jan](#): > > The WASM version clearly wants the HTML, JavaScript and JSON support, but not the HTTP server libraries. How feasible it would be extracting JSON-related code from there? HTML is big one and probably troublesome since so many guides and documentation refers to HTML support as being from http package. General JSON representation was mentioned here: > [@Blocking operations in the WASM version (JavaScript expertise needed)](https://swi-prolog.discourse.group/t/blocking-operations-in-the-wasm-version-javascript-expertise-needed/5655/16): > > Sounds good. For now my emphasis is on the low level. I definitely need support to get the high level right. I have had discussions with @ericzinda on a new general JSON representation for Prolog terms. The idea is to create something where the terms you normally like to transfer (lists, strings, numbers, objects) come pretty natural, but the representation has escapes that allow for faithful round trip of arbitrary Prolog terms. One thing at a time slight_smile Auto yield is in the… Was it about this representation? [https://www.swi-prolog.org/pldoc/doc\_for?object=term\_to\_json/3](https://www.swi-prolog.org/pldoc/doc_for?object=term_to_json/3) --- _[View the full topic](https://swi-prolog.discourse.group/t/wiki-discussion-swi-prolog-in-the-browser-using-wasm/5651)._