Hi @jan. Would your suggestion “[…] for the community would be to come up with a collectively maintained core documentation that includes the variations between predicates such as subtract/3 and the availability (built-in, (which) library) […]” align with PEP-like (or similar) repository? I understand that those documents would be useful and shared not only for SWI but for other Prolog systems. Actually, it looks a lot like Prolog Commons, with the difference that it is not necessary to share code, just specifications/documentation for the “common good”.
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pure and correct Prolog - what is it? (Creating Prolog Cookbook) | 19 | 2003 | January 30, 2020 | |
| SWI Prolog docset for Dash, Zeal etc | 0 | 891 | February 25, 2019 | |
| Contributing libraries | 24 | 1198 | March 20, 2019 | |
| DOC: xref_comment/[3,4] not in docs | 9 | 583 | August 1, 2019 | |
| Does PLDoc have a way to incorporate unit tests akin to Python's doctest? | 28 | 2047 | August 9, 2019 |